Policy
Substrate Scope Policy
Which execution substrates may appear in the Validation Lab and under what admission criteria.
Governance Boundary
Non-certification · Evidence-based verdicts only · No endorsement · No execution hosting · Full statement →
1. Key Principle
- •This policy does not define MPLP protocol requirements.
- •This policy does not certify or endorse any framework.
- •The Lab adjudicates evidence, not execution.
2. Scope Tiers
Tier-0Canonical Target List
The minimal mainstream set required to credibly claim cross-framework adjudication.
Execution Frameworks (4)
- • LangGraph
- • AutoGen
- • Semantic Kernel
- • LangChain
Protocol Rails (2)
- • A2A
- • MCP
📊 SSOT: data/curated-runs/substrate-index.yaml
Frameworks with meaningful adoption (e.g., LlamaIndex, Haystack)
Niche, experimental, or closed-source substrates
3. Claim Levels (Admissibility)
Each substrate evidence pack carries a claim level indicating its reproducibility:
| Level | Definition |
|---|---|
| Declared | Static or mocked producer; evidence present but not reproduced |
| Reproduced | Deterministic reproduction demonstrated (run-twice hash match) |
| Cross-Verified | Equivalence evidence across paradigms under the same ruleset |
4. Admission Criteria
For an evidence pack to be admitted (ADMISSIBLE), it must pass these structural gates:
MAN-001All required manifest fields present (pack_version, protocol_version, etc.)INT-001SHA256 sums verification passes for all listed filesINT-002Pack root hash matches computed hashINT-003All pack files covered by SHA256 sums (no uncovered files)VER-*Protocol version binding and schemas bundle hash verification
See Intake Policy for status taxonomy (REGISTERED, ADJUDICATED, NOT_ADMISSIBLE, etc.)
Traceability
This page is a public projection of the internal governance document. Authoritative source: SUBSTRATE_SCOPE_POLICY.md ↗